Trade associations perform many useful and legitimate functions. Because trade association meetings bring together competitors makes the meetings vulnerable to antitrust scrutiny and can expose participants to antitrust claims.
Section 1 of the Sherman Act, a key US antitrust law, prohibits any agreement between two or more companies that results in an unreasonable restraint of trade. There is no safe harbor under the antitrust laws for trade association activities. Violating the Sherman Act is a felony that can result in imprisonment for up to 10 years, in addition to civil penalties and reputational damage.
Under the antitrust laws, company employees are not allowed to discuss certain topics with competitors. Company employees should heed the following warnings, which apply to all contacts with a company’s competitors, when attending trade association meetings to avoid running afoul of the antitrust laws.
You should not discuss the company’s non-public,
competitively sensitive information with competitors, including:
In addition, do not:
Any type of joint effort with trade association members should be first vetted by counsel, including data exchanges, joint ventures, or lobbying efforts. We also want to avoid creating the appearance of illegal collusion, or that inappropriate communications or information exchanges are taking place. Any meeting with a competitor could later be interpreted as evidence of an illegal information exchange or of cartel activity. As much as possible, avoid side-meetings and conversations with your competitors during this meeting.
Cartel agreements are agreements between competitors to fix prices, alter output, allocate markets or customers, or rig bids. This type of behavior is per se illegal, meaning there is no justification. It is automatically illegal. If these topics come up during the meeting:
It is possible that, if discussion steers towards a sensitive topic, it will be less obvious or overt than the per se violations discussed above. For this or other reasons, it may not be feasible to immediately interrupt or leave the discussion. If that happens:
If an inappropriate discussion arises during a side conversation in which you are involved, insist that it end immediately. If it continues, announce your intent to leave because you feel it violates the law. Leave, and immediately contact the association’s legal counsel.
Lawmakers and regulators recognize that trade associations and standard-setting organizations often promote competitively benign or procompetitive activities, such as:
Not all information exchanges with competitors are prohibited. There are safe harbors to guide information exchanges with procompetitive or benign purposes. Generally, information is not considered competitively sensitive if it is:
Procompetitive or benign information exchanges that reduce fraud or confer consumer benefits are particularly encouraged. Nonetheless, all information exchanges with meeting attendees or trade association members should be cleared in advance with the association’s legal counsel.
If you receive any documents containing non-public, competitor, or industry information at a trade association meeting (for example, if a customer gives you a document that includes information about a competitor), make a notation on the document listing the source, date, and context in which you received it, so that it is clear to a reader that the document is not evidence of an anticompetitive information exchange. Contact the association’s legal counsel if you think the document could be viewed as evidence of prohibited activity.
If, after the meeting, you become concerned about a topic that was discussed, immediately contact the association’s legal counsel. Do not discuss the topic further with other participants.
The association’s legal counsel is Eric Pritchard. Eric can be reached at eric.pritchard@pierfered.com.